Travis Kelce hints he and Taylor Swift are considering huge life change after highly anticipated wedding

Travis Kelce gave a sign that he and Taylor Swift are changing their last names after getting married.

The NFL athlete, 36, “liked” an Instagram post Tuesday from the podcast “Bussin With the Boys,” in which hosts Will Compton and Taylor Lewan discussed if Swift will change her last name to Kelce after tying the knot.

A guest on the podcast noted that Swift was “way more globally famous” than Kelce, and that Kelce would have to change his name. The hosts joked that “Travis Swift” was a fitting name for Kelce, but that “Taylor Kelce” also sounded good.

They then landed on the two hyphenating their last names to “Swift-Kelce.”

“No, you gotta go Swift-Kelce — Travis Swift-Kelce,” they enthusiastically said.

Fans loved Kelce liking the post, with one fan commenting, “Travis liking this is hilarious 😂😂 that’s why he’s perfect for her.”

Another wrote, “love that travis liked this video 😂😍.”

Kelce proposed to Swift in August 2025 after two years of dating. A source told Page Six that they’re expected to wed this summer in New York City.

The couple hasn’t been shy about going on public date nights ahead of their big day.

On Saturday, they attended a Knicks game in New York, though Kelce — an Ohio native — was of course cheering for the Cleveland Cavaliers. Though the Cavaliers ended up losing, Kelce appeared to enjoy himself, at one point shotgunning a beer courtside while Swift covered her face in amusement.

With their wedding just weeks away, lawyer Sarah Luetto, a partner in Blank Rome’s Matrimonial & Family Law Group, exclusively spoke with Page Six about what a potential prenuputial agreement between the pair might entail.

They could be barred from discussing their marriage under a prenuptial non-disclosure agreement — though the pop star, 36, could still retain the right to sing about their relationship.

“Swift and Kelce may wish to include terms fostering confidentiality and privacy,” Leutto, who does not represent either party, told us. “This may include non-disparagement or non-disclosure terms related to their relationship.”

“In Taylor’s case, she would likely not want to include provisions limiting her from singing about her relationship in songs, particularly since there is always so much speculation about the subjects of her songwriting,” she added.