Disney is arguing it had a First Amendment right to fire âMandalorianâ actress Gina Carano after she posted tweets that were out-of-step with the trans-rights movement, and an image the company claims was controversial as it pertained to the Holocaust.
Carano sued the House of Mouse in February claiming the company broke the law then it retaliated against her for expressing personal political beliefs.
Attorneys for the mega-entertainment brand filed a motion on Tuesday to dismiss the suit, arguing the company has a âconstitutional right not to associate its artistic expression with Caranoâs speech.â
The actressâs suit is being funded by X-owner Elon Musk, who offered last August to fund lawsuits of employees who had been terminated for their posts on his platform.
Carano, 41, was fired in February of 2021 after she compared the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany to conservatives in modern America.
Attorneys for Disney filed a motion on Tuesday to dismiss actress Gina Caranoâs wrongful termination suit, arguing the company has a âconstitutional right not to associate its artistic expression withâ the actressâs speech

Carano was terminated by Disney after a string of politically tinged social media posts, including one that compared treatment of modern American conservatives to Jews during the Holocaust

She was also accused of mocking gender pronouns for listing âbeep/bop/boopâ in her social media bio where users often include pronouns such as he/him/his or they/them/theirsÂ
The post, which originated from another account, appeared on Caranoâs story and read: âJews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers but by their neighbors ⊠even by children.â
In quotation marks the caption then reads: âBecause history is edited, most people today donât realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?â
The words appear above a disturbing image of a woman in undergarments running from two young boys in Nazi Germany.
The actress had faced earlier pushback against her posts to social media about COVID-19 restrictions, to which she mostly objected, and the 2020 election, questioning Donald Trumpâs loss to Joe Biden.
She also refused to signal support for transgender rights on her public social media profiles, with which Disney apparently took issue.Â
According to her suit, the conglomerate forced her to sit through a 90-minute Zoom meeting with officials from GLAAD after she wrote âboop/bop/beepâ in her Twitter profile, instead of taking seriously the assignment of identifying her pronouns publicly.
In its motion, Disney says the Nazi post acted as the âfinal straw.â
The post, the company argues, trivialized the Holocaust by referring to âthousandsâ of Jews, not âmillions,â and by likening their experience to those of modern American conservatives.
At that point, âDisney had enough,â reads the filing.
The day her post went up, the corporation put out a statement calling her comments âabhorrent and unacceptable,â and adding that it had no future plans to hire her on any projects.

The actressâs suit is being funded by X-owner Elon Musk, who offered last August to fund lawsuits of employees who had been terminated for their posts on his platformÂ

Carano, who became something of a sensation among the conservative community on what was then Twitter, brought suit under the California law that prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for political activity.
Disney responded by arguing that there is a broad exception for organizations whose business it is to engage in speech â like newspapers. The company referenced a recent law article written by one of Caranoâs attorneys â UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh.
âWhen an employee or prospective employee says things, even off the job, that would undermine the employerâs message, the employer must be able to distance itself from the employee,â he wrote two years ago.
Thus, argue Bob Igerâs fleet of legal minds, Disney was âentitled to protect its creative speech in the âStar Warsâ series from association with views Disney and many viewers (and potential viewers) considered offensive and contrary to Disneyâs values.â
âCaranoâs presence as a prominent actor on âThe Mandalorianâ interfered with Disneyâs choice not to produce a show associated with her beliefs,â they wrote.
The actress additionally alleged that the company discriminated against her on the basis of sex, citing the fact that Disney took no action after male actors Pedro Pascal and Mark Hamill posted material comparing followers and supporters of President Donald Trump to Nazis.
Disney argued that the standard it applied to Carano doesnât matter.
âThe First Amendment protects Disneyâs decision to dissociate itself from some speech but not from other, different speech.
âThe First Amendment mandates deference to the speakerâs own decisions about what speech to associate with, even if others might consider those decisions âinternally inconsistentâ ⊠Carano thus cannot stake out a discrimination claim by alleging that Disney accorded different treatment to different statements by different actors,â they wrote.

The suit alleges wrongful termination and discrimination, and demands that the court force Lucasfilm to recast her as well as pay her at least $75,000 in damages
Caranoâs suit, filed in California federal court, alleges wrongful termination and discrimination, and demands that the court force Lucasfilm to recast her as well as pay her at least $75,000 in damages. Â
Carano had played Cara Dune for the first two seasons of the hit show âThe Mandalorian,â which streams on Disney+.
According to the complaint, Disney and Lucasfilm harassed and defamed Carano for refusing to conform with their viewpoints.Â
Carano argues that the entertainment giant turned a blind eye to her male costars who she claims put up offensive posts aimed at Republicans.Â
She also claims she was required to meet with representatives of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Discrimination, which demanded a public apology from her.
The complaint states: âDefendants went so far as to try and convince Caranoâs publicist to force Carano to issue a statement admitting to mocking or insulting an entire group of people, which Carano had never done.Â
âAfter she refused to issue the statement Defendants demanded, and Defendants rejected Caranoâs proposed alternate statement, Defendants increased their harassment of Carano.â Â
Carano says she was then told to meet with Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy and employees who identified as LGBTQ+.Â
After declining to do so, she was terminated shortly after from The Mandalorian, as well as other Star Wars titles.Â
Read the full article here